Forums
Issues
People
Lists
Blogs
Members
  • Content
    • Articles
    • Quotes
    • Facts
    • Videos
    • Images
ABOUT
JOIN
LOGIN
Forums> USER>    

Posts

 
2009-03-08 10:14 AM
Edit Edit  
Photo
Frank K
Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 26
In an article by Eric Steig, of the University of Washington published in Nature Journal and summarized in the Jan 22, 2009 Times Online, the author notes that:

Antarctica is warming up just like the rest of the world a new study has found, blowing a hole in an argument of climate change sceptics.

In the last 50 years, despite cooling in parts of the continent over the last two decades, Antarctica has been getting “steadily warmer”.

Using the new measurements scientists were able to conclude that the continent has been warming up at a rate of 0.12C every decade since the 1950s.

2009-02-21 09:04 AM
Edit Edit  
Photo
Frank K
Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 26
Harmonsmith brings up a topic that seems to make the back pages of the news, yet is just as important as the issues of Climate Change and Alternative Energy that seem to capture most of the recent environmental headlines. People get more involved if they understand how an issue affects them locally. People can learn more about polluted waters where they live by clicking in their zip code at the EPA website, Surf Your Watershed.

During the Presidential campaign, Alternet published an article on October 17, 2008, Obama vs. McCain: Progressive Voter Guide to Water Issues.

As the Alternet article pointed out, "water issues have largely been absent from the public debate and have barely been mentioned by either the Obama or the McCain campaigns". Alternet provides recommended solutions and compares what the candidates have done or have promised.  Obama stated his position on several water issues including scarcity, pollution and clean water, but particularly on pollution, his record falls short of the Alternet recommended solution.  On clean water, "Obama says he will support and sign into law legislation that effectively restores the historical scope of the Clean Water Act and advances environmental protection, community values and public health objectives. But Obama is in favor of so-called "clean coal" and other clean technologies that would continue destructive coal mining practices like MTR." The recent coal ash retention pond disaster in Tennessee is an example of what coal is really costing us environmentally...that and mountain top strip mining.

Obama's stance on these issues is an improvement over the last eight years, but where will clean water fall in the list of priorities? Also, while the Federal government should be actively involved, the responsibility must be shared with state and local governments.  The economy should not be an excuse for relaxing standards.

2009-01-31 04:10 PM
Edit Edit  
Photo
Frank K
Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 26
The global warming skeptics keep citing the current cold wave in Norh America as evidence that global warming is a myth.  However, looking down under, global warming is anything but a myth.  As reported by EarthTimes on January 31st, Melbourne residents are enduring record heat that has knocked out power lines, sidelined commuter train services and stoked forest fires that have claimed at least 20 houses on the fringes of Australia's second-biggest city.

"Eleven of the hottest years in history have been in the last 12, and we also note, particularly in the southern part of Australia, we are seeing less rainfall," she said. "All of this is consistent with climate change, and all of this is consistent with what scientists told us would happen."
2009-01-31 02:01 PM
Edit Edit  
Photo
Frank K
Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 26
The Heartland Institute is sponsoring the 2009 International Conference on Climate Change, March 8-10 in New York City. They are advertizing that participants will include economists, legal experts, and other climate specialists calling attention to new research that contradicts claims that Earth’s moderate warming during the 20th Century primarily was man-made and has reached crisis proportions. They expect to draw 1,000 attendees including private-sector business people, state and federal legislators and officials, policy analysts, media, and students.

The Heartland website lists "anti-global warming" speakers and their credetials including William Gray, Colorado State University, leading researcher into tropical weather patterns; Richard Lindzen, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, one of the world’s leading experts in dynamic meteorology, especially planetary waves; Stephen McIntyre, primary author of Climate Audit, a blog devoted to the analysis and discussion of climate data; Arthur Robinson, curator of a global warming petition signed by more than 32,000 American scientists, including more than 10,000 with doctorate degrees, rejecting the alarmist assertion that global warming has put the Earth in crisis and is caused primarily by mankind; Willie Soon, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics; and Roy Spencer, University of Alabama at Huntsville, principal research scientist and team leader on NASA’s Aqua satellite.

Does anyone know if the Heartland Institute and these speakers have any scientific backing from credible climatologists?
2009-01-17 09:55 AM
Edit Edit  
Photo
Frank K
Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 26
In this AlterNet article by Steve Conner, temperatures in the Arctic for October 2008 were significantly higher – between 3C and 5C above average. Scientists at the US National Snow and Ice Data Centre (NSIDC) in Colorado believe the only reasonable explanation for such high autumn readings is Arctic amplification -- the notion that rises in surface air temperatures in response to increased atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations will be larger in the Arctic than elsewhere over the globe. The ocean heat accumulated during the summer because of the loss of sea ice is being released back into the atmosphere from the sea before winter sea ice has chance to reform.

According to the NSIDC scientists, this is happening 10-15 years earlier than predicted by their climate models.  The findings raise concerns that the Arctic has already passed the climatic tipping-point towards ice-free summers, beyond which it may not recover.
2009-01-03 02:37 PM
Edit Edit  
Photo
Frank K
Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 26
For those of us that live in the Rockies, we grimace as we see miles and miles of pine forests with brown needles. Now our beloved aspens are threatened as well.  In this December 2008 Smithsonian article by Michelle Nijhuis, the cause of Sudden Aspen Decline or "SAD" is believed to be related to bark beetles that are attacking aspens groves in increasingly large numbers following long periods of drought and higher temperatures.  Even more worrisome is evidence that the groves are not regenerating themselves. The aspens are to Colorado and the western states what the palm trees are to Florida and other southern states.  It will be a sad day when we lose our aspens.
2008-10-29 08:17 AM
Edit Edit  
Photo
Frank K
Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 26
One of the center pieces of John McCain's campaign rhetoric is the building of 45 nuclear power plants.  However, one fact that McCain ignores is that no nuclear power plants will be built without massive tax payer subsidies and loan guarantees. The plants are simply too risky for Wall Street to finance. In the Energy Bill before Congress the nuclear industry  is lobbying for government (tax payer) “guarantees up to 100 percent of any loan or debt obligation” for the building of nuclear plants.  McCain is opposed to subsidies for alternative energy sources, but is one of the principle supporters of tax subsidies for nuclear power in legislation before Congress.

The first nuclear power plant to be built in the USA in 30 years will be built in Georgia.  The estimated cost is $13 billion.  With these levels of capital costs, what will be the tax payer exposure for 45 nuclear power plants? Is this a form of corporate socialism that McCain criticizes Obama for?

Oh and here's an Oct 28 quote from McCain in case anyone missed it: "We talked about nuclear power, well it has to be safe, environment, blah, blah, blah."

Is McCain's rather dismissive "blah, blah, blah" right out of the "Straight Talk Express"?
2008-10-12 09:27 AM
Edit Edit  
Photo
Frank K
Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 26
A BBC Science article states that "the global economy is losing more money from the disappearance of forests than through the current banking crisis, according to an EU-commissioned study."  Annual cost of forest loss, estimated at between $2 trillion and $5 trillion, comes from "adding the value of the various services that forests perform, such as providing clean water and absorbing carbon dioxide".
2008-07-04 04:54 PM
Edit Edit  
Photo
Frank K
Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 26

Looking at Table 2.12 from the recently released Transportation Energy Data Book, it would appear that van pooling with an average of 6.1 passengers per van offers the most energy efficient mode of transportation.  With 1,322 Btu per passenger mile, it even beats motorcycles at 1,855 Btu per passenger mile.  Cars with an average load factor of 1.57 persons per vehicle use 3,512 Btu per passenger mile, while transit buses are surprisingly high at 4,235 Btu per passenger mile because of their relatively low average load factor of 8.8 persons per vehicle. For people in suburbs wanting to save money on gasoline, it appears that van pooling is the most economical and efficient way to save energy and help the environment, but it does also require a life style change.

2008-05-23 11:00 PM
Edit Edit  
Photo
Frank K
Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 26

Paper or plastic?  People are creatures of habit, and sometimes it takes more than their environmental consciousness to force change.  In Colorado Springs during the drought of a few years ago, watering restrictions were imposed.  It forced a dramatic decrease in water usage, but surprisingly when the water restrictions were lifted, the water usage didn’t go back up much.  People’s habits were largely changed. So what would happen if grocery and other stores were mandated to charge a 10 cent “environmental fee” for every plastic or paper bag used? We would see a dramatic reduction in plastic bags and more usage of canvas bags.  If after a year government decides to eliminate the fee, people by then will have adjusted to their canvas bags. In Michigan it is very hard to find a discarded aluminum can or bottle on the side of the road or around a picnic ground or beach.  That’s because stores are required to charge a refundable deposit on selected cans and bottles.  The practice of returning bottles and cans has become a habit for Michiganders and they don’t litter…even for those bottles that are not a part of the mandated charges.  Hitting one’s pocket book forces a change in habits...a change that is now embodied in their life styles.

2008-05-23 10:18 PM
Edit Edit  
Photo
Frank K
Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 26

It is interesting to note that the more industrialized countries are at the bottom of the Greendex for sustainability of lifestyles.  James Kunstler in his book The Long Emergency portrays a rather pessimistic and brutal scenario for the sustainability of life styles in America suburbia following “peak oil”.  While some might view his prognostications as alarmist, it would be foolish to not take heed of his warnings. A concerted campaign by everyone to improve our Greendex may soften the impact, but ultimately it will be simple economics that forces a change of life styles.  Are the early signs of peak oil now being felt with $4.00 a gallon gasoline? Are we entering the early stages of the Long Emergency? As Kunstler said: “Life in the Long Emergency will be about staying where you are”.

2008-04-21 05:46 AM
Edit Edit  
Photo
Frank K
Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 26

Obama's website includes a comprehensive energy plan: Plan to Make America a Global Energy Leader, and an environment plan - A Plan to Promote a Healthy Environment.  Clinton's website includes a comprensive Plan to address the Energy and Climate Crisis.  McCain's website contains 10 sentences under Stewards of Our Nation's Rich Natural Heritage, but lacks the specific details of the Obama and Clinton plans.  Outside of a few statements in speeches it is difficult to know where McCain stands on the environmental and energy issues of the day.  He has a zero rating by the League of Conservation Voters because he has missed every single Senate vote on green issues. Obama's and Clinton's ratings are 86 pct and 90 pct, respectively; they found time in their busy schedules to vote. I am awaiting more specifics on McCain's environment and energy proposals.

2008-04-14 03:20 PM
Edit Edit  
Photo
Frank K
Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 26
The plastics that are sent to garbage and landfills don't end up in the ocean.  Most of the platics in the "sea of plastics" result from disposal of garbage by ships, and plastics that are disposed of in our rivers and beaches and carried out to sea. Maritime laws are being adopted regarding disposal of platics from ships, but it is also the ordinary citizen that is guilty of carelessly leaving their  plastic beverage bottles and other containers behind in recreation spots to be later blown into rivers and lakes or out to sea if at a beach.  I see those plastic water bottles scattered around quite often in recreational areas.  A deposit on the containers is a nuisance, but maybe that's what is needed. It seems to work in places like Michigan.
2008-04-14 02:40 PM
Edit Edit  
Photo
Frank K
Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 26
According to Rep Peter DeFazio writing on this USDA website: '"the Forest Service has a national maintenance backlog for its recreational facilities and trails of about $1 billion. The new user fees the agency collected last year would cover only .06 percent of that backlog. At that rate it will take about 1,600 years to catch up". De Fazio goes on to state that "the recreational fee program violates the principle that our national forests belong to the people of this nation and should be accessible to them. It is also fueling a deep resentment of our land management agencies and of Congress. It should be repealed" . In it's place he favors "a 5 percent royalty on gold and other valuable minerals that mining companies now extract from our public lands for free".
2008-03-10 01:39 PM
Edit Edit  
Photo
Frank K
Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 26
An article in the March 7th New York Times discusses the Forest Service's increase in forest and wilderness user fees for anything from parking to just walking in wilderness areas or trails. For example, along a 14-mile stretch of state highway near Denver that borders the Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests and tops out on Mount Evans, if people stop their car to take a picture of a mountain goat, rangers can force them to pay a $10 fee. Nothing is free anymore.

CONTACT US - LINKS - TERMS & CONDITIONS - PRIVACY POLICY

© Copyright 2008-2009 The Environment Hub. All Rights Reserved.

GLOBAL WARMING - NUCLEAR ENERGY - BIOFUELS - FOSSIL FUELS - RENEWABLE ENERGY - AIR POLLUTION - ANIMALS - AGRICULTURE - LIVING GREEN - KYOTO PROTOCOL

PARTNER WEBSITES: CITY - POLITICS - RELIGION - SCIENCE - MEDICINE - ENGINEERING - YOUNG PROFESSIONALS